🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.